The Economics of Central Clearing
Albert J. Menkveld and Guillaume Vuillemey
World Federation of Exchanges
April 2021
Perhaps of interest: Microstructure summer school
Motivation
- Mandatory CCPs since 2008-09 crisis
- Boom in CCP literature since then
- Our survey covers 124 papers
- Of these, 88 papers appeared after 2009
- CCP issues regularly resurface since then
- Near failure in 2018: Nasdaq Clearing (electricity futures, Einar Aas, ~68% default fund)
- Central clearing US treasuries (netting eff. ~$330 billion, 60%, Fleming and Keane, NY Fed 2021)
- Margin breaches during COVID-19 crisis
Margin breaches
Credit: Woodall (2020a)
Margin breaches
Credit: Woodall (2020a)
Theory
- Modigliani-Miller theorem: No role for CCPs
- No role for CCPs: They are just splitting cash flows
- Need explicit friction to justify CCPs
- Benefits
- CCPs insure against counterparty risk
- CCPs pool and diversify idiosyncratic counterparty risk
- Margins serve as deductibles (adv. selection/moral hazard)
- CCPs create multilateral netting efficiencies
- CCPs mitigate fire sales
- Low prices due to adverse selection or capital constraints
- Auctions run by CCPs can mitigate price discounts
- Costs
- CCPs might create moral hazard
- CCPs create systemic risk
Empirics
- CCPs and asset prices
- CCPs reduce volatility and pricing of counterparty risk
- Both historical and recent evidence
- CCPs and trading in underlying assets
- First derivatives CCP boosted trade flows
- CCPs and fire sale mitigation
- Historical evidence
- Anecdotal evidence from Lehman
CCP Design
Nokia: April 22, 2010
CCP Design
- Measure of CCP exposure to its members: ExpCCP
Menkveld (RAPS, 2017), VaR extension of Duffie and Zhu (RAPS, 2011)
Design of CCPs
- Design of margins
- Crowded positions
- Design of stress tests
- Default waterfall and resolution
- Insights about the role of each waterfall resource
- Lack of contracting models with optimal waterfalls
- Governance of CCPs
- Member-owned CCPs?
- Governance of member-owned utilities understudied
- Number of CCPs
- Costs of multiple CCPs: Fragmentation and CCP basis
- Benefits in terms of financial stability?
Regulation
- Benefits of mandatory CCPs
- Coordination failures arising from network externalities
- Traders do not raise enough collateral bilaterally
- Inability to observe all of a counterparty's other positions
- Costs of mandatory CCPs: Moral hazard
- CCPs now have captive clienteles
- CCP members have lower incentives to monitor counterparty risk
- Too big to fail?
- Regulation of CCPs?
- Capital requirements?
- Other risk management constraints?
- Role of central bank access?
Open questions
- Industrial organization of central clearing
- How do CCPs compete?
- Become a CCP member or use client clearing at an existing CCP member?
- Interoperability?
- How do CCPs invest their collateral?
- Does it affect other markets?
- For example, does it create risks?
- CCPs in the broader market environment
- Should CCPs be introduced elsewhere?
- How does the added value of a CCPs depend on traded contract?